America East 2017 Field Hockey

Overall Statistics

 

CONFERENCE FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS

 

SCORING MARGIN GP Offense Defense Margin
1. Maine 18 2.86 1.54 1.32
2. Albany 19 2.60 1.40 1.20
3. Stanford 21 2.40 1.58 0.81
4. California 17 2.39 2.06 0.33
5. Pacific 19 2.89 2.58 0.31
6. UMass Lowell 20 1.85 2.22 -0.37
7. Vermont 17 1.57 2.25 -0.67
8. New Hampshire 20 1.80 2.65 -0.85
9. UC Davis 18 0.98 3.82 -2.84
 
SCORING AVERAGE GP Goals Minutes Avg.
1. Pacific 19 56 1357:07 2.89
2. Maine 18 52 1270:51 2.86
3. Albany 19 52 1399:47 2.60
4. Stanford 21 53 1546:46 2.40
5. California 17 43 1257:37 2.39
6. UMass Lowell 20 40 1513:51 1.85
7. New Hampshire 20 38 1477:19 1.80
8. Vermont 17 28 1245:17 1.57
9. UC Davis 18 18 1281:29 0.98
 
SHUTOUTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Albany 19 4 0.21
2. Vermont 17 3 0.18
Maine 18 3 0.17
Stanford 21 3 0.14
5. Pacific 19 2 0.11
6. California 17 1 0.06
UMass Lowell 20 1 0.05
8. UC Davis 18 0 0.00
New Hampshire 20 0 0.00
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG GP GA Minutes GA Avg.
1. Albany 19 28 1399:47 1.40
2. Maine 18 28 1270:51 1.54
3. Stanford 21 35 1546:46 1.58
4. California 17 37 1257:37 2.06
5. UMass Lowell 20 48 1513:51 2.22
6. Vermont 17 40 1245:17 2.25
7. Pacific 19 50 1357:07 2.58
8. New Hampshire 20 56 1477:19 2.65
9. UC Davis 18 70 1281:29 3.82
 
SHOTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Maine 18 305 16.94
2. New Hampshire 20 298 14.90
3. Pacific 19 287 15.11
4. UMass Lowell 20 278 13.90
5. Albany 19 277 14.58
6. Stanford 21 274 13.05
7. California 17 263 15.47
8. Vermont 17 210 12.35
9. UC Davis 18 109 6.06
 
SHOTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Maine 18 305 16.94
2. California 17 263 15.47
3. Pacific 19 287 15.11
4. New Hampshire 20 298 14.90
5. Albany 19 277 14.58
6. UMass Lowell 20 278 13.90
7. Stanford 21 274 13.05
8. Vermont 17 210 12.35
9. UC Davis 18 109 6.06
 
GOALS SCORED GP No. Avg/G
1. Pacific 19 56 2.95
2. Stanford 21 53 2.52
3. Albany 19 52 2.74
Maine 18 52 2.89
5. California 17 43 2.53
6. UMass Lowell 20 40 2.00
7. New Hampshire 20 38 1.90
8. Vermont 17 28 1.65
9. UC Davis 18 18 1.00
 
GOALS SCORED/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Pacific 19 56 2.95
2. Maine 18 52 2.89
3. Albany 19 52 2.74
4. California 17 43 2.53
5. Stanford 21 53 2.52
6. UMass Lowell 20 40 2.00
7. New Hampshire 20 38 1.90
8. Vermont 17 28 1.65
9. UC Davis 18 18 1.00
 
GOALS ALLOWED GP No. Avg/G
1. Albany 19 28 1.47
Maine 18 28 1.56
3. Stanford 21 35 1.67
4. California 17 37 2.18
5. Vermont 17 40 2.35
6. UMass Lowell 20 48 2.40
7. Pacific 19 50 2.63
8. New Hampshire 20 56 2.80
9. UC Davis 18 70 3.89
 
GOALS ALLOWED/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Albany 19 28 1.47
2. Maine 18 28 1.56
3. Stanford 21 35 1.67
4. California 17 37 2.18
5. Vermont 17 40 2.35
6. UMass Lowell 20 48 2.40
7. Pacific 19 50 2.63
8. New Hampshire 20 56 2.80
9. UC Davis 18 70 3.89
 
ASSISTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Stanford 21 54 2.57
2. Pacific 19 53 2.79
3. Maine 18 42 2.33
4. California 17 34 2.00
5. Albany 19 32 1.68
6. UMass Lowell 20 30 1.50
New Hampshire 20 30 1.50
8. Vermont 17 17 1.00
9. UC Davis 18 15 0.83
 
ASSISTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Pacific 19 53 2.79
2. Stanford 21 54 2.57
3. Maine 18 42 2.33
4. California 17 34 2.00
5. Albany 19 32 1.68
6. UMass Lowell 20 30 1.50
New Hampshire 20 30 1.50
8. Vermont 17 17 1.00
9. UC Davis 18 15 0.83
 
SAVES GP Saves Avg/G
1. UMass Lowell 20 160 8.00
2. UC Davis 18 156 8.67
3. Stanford 21 129 6.14
4. New Hampshire 20 113 5.65
5. Pacific 19 112 5.89
6. Vermont 17 107 6.29
7. California 17 94 5.53
8. Albany 19 91 4.79
9. Maine 18 62 3.44
 
SAVES PER GAME GP Saves Avg/G GA Save%
1. UC Davis 18 156 8.67 70 .690
2. UMass Lowell 20 160 8.00 48 .769
3. Vermont 17 107 6.29 40 .728
4. Stanford 21 129 6.14 35 .787
5. Pacific 19 112 5.89 50 .691
6. New Hampshire 20 113 5.65 56 .669
7. California 17 94 5.53 37 .718
8. Albany 19 91 4.79 28 .765
9. Maine 18 62 3.44 28 .689
 
PENALTY CORNERS GP No. Avg/G
1. Pacific 19 121 6.37
2. New Hampshire 20 117 5.85
3. Albany 19 116 6.11
UMass Lowell 20 116 5.80
5. Stanford 21 110 5.24
6. Maine 18 94 5.22
7. Vermont 17 90 5.29
California 17 90 5.29
9. UC Davis 18 55 3.06
 
DEFENSIVE SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. UC Davis 18 8 0.44
2. Vermont 17 6 0.35
3. UMass Lowell 20 5 0.25
Stanford 21 5 0.24
5. Albany 19 3 0.16
Pacific 19 3 0.16
New Hampshire 20 3 0.15
California 17 3 0.18
9. Maine 18 2 0.11
 

East
Standings Conference Pct. GF GA   Overall Pct. GF GA
Maine 6-2-0 .750 16 9   12-6-0 .667 52 28
Albany 6-2-0 .750 21 10   12-7-0 .632 52 28
New Hampshire 4-4-0 .500 16 19   9-11-0 .450 38 56
UMass Lowell 3-5-0 .375 19 21   9-11-0 .450 41 48
Vermont 1-7-0 .125 10 23   5-12-0 .294 28 40
 
West
Standings Conference Pct. GF GA   Overall Pct. GF GA
Stanford 4-2-0 .667 19 8   13-8-0 .619 54 35
California 4-2-0 .667 16 14   9-8-0 .529 43 37
Pacific 4-2-0 .667 17 10   10-9-0 .526 56 50
UC Davis 0-6-0 .000 8 28   1-17-0 .056 18 70
 
Current unbeaten streak No. Record in streak
 
Team Summaries GP GF-GA Score-Avg Margin PK-Att Shots Saves Save% Corners
Albany 19 52-28 2.60-1.40 +1.20 2-2 277 91 76.5 116
California 17 43-37 2.39-2.06 +0.33 1-2 263 94 71.8 90
Maine 18 52-28 2.86-1.54 +1.32 3-3 305 62 68.9 94
New Hampshire 20 38-56 1.80-2.65 -0.85 1-1 298 113 66.9 117
Pacific 19 56-50 2.89-2.58 +0.31 2-3 287 112 69.1 121
Stanford 21 53-35 2.40-1.58 +0.81 1-1 274 129 78.7 110
UC Davis 18 18-70 0.98-3.82 -2.84 0-0 109 156 69.0 55
UMass Lowell 20 40-48 1.85-2.22 -0.37 2-3 278 160 76.9 116
Vermont 17 28-40 1.57-2.25 -0.67 2-2 210 107 72.8 90
 
Attendance Home Average   Away Average   Neutral Average   Total Average
Albany 13-821 63   6-1292 215   0-0 0   19-2113 111
California 8-1654 207   8-1682 210   1-135 135   17-3471 204
Maine 8-1617 202   8-1078 135   2-160 80   18-2855 159
New Hampshire 8-1492 186   11-1857 169   1-0 0   20-3349 167
Pacific 6-776 129   12-2350 196   1-43 43   19-3169 167
Stanford 10-2474 247   7-2563 366   4-253 63   21-5290 252
UC Davis 8-720 90   9-2130 237   1-74 74   18-2924 162
UMass Lowell 11-2562 233   8-1316 164   1-87 87   20-3965 198
Vermont 8-1248 156   8-1593 199   1-126 126   17-2967 175
Totals 80-13364 167   77-15861 206   12-878 73   169-30103 178  
 
 

INDIVIDUAL FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS

 

To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 50.0% of their team's games,
goalies at least 33.0% of their team's minutes.

SHOTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 85 4.47
2. Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 82 3.90
3. Savannah Burns-PACIFIC 19 79 4.16
4. Libby Riedl-MAINE 18 75 4.17
5. Katie MacCallum-ALBANY 19 69 3.63
6. Megan Rodgers-CAL 17 67 3.94
7. HUK, Torrie-UML 20 66 3.30
8. Ghislaine Beerkens-ALBANY 19 62 3.26
9. Landon Warren-VERMONT 17 54 3.18
10. Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 49 2.72
11. LALANDE, Anouk-UML 20 48 2.40
12. Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 46 2.30
13. Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 45 2.14
14. Brianna Ricker-MAINE 18 44 2.44
15. Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 39 2.05
16. Ashley Mendonca-UNH 20 37 1.85
17. Frederike Helmke-ALBANY 19 36 1.89
DOIRON, Christa-UML 20 36 1.80
19. Lauren Tucker-VERMONT 17 35 2.06
20. Jackie Gillen-VERMONT 17 34 2.00
 
SHOTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 85 4.47
2. Libby Riedl-MAINE 18 75 4.17
3. Savannah Burns-PACIFIC 19 79 4.16
4. Megan Rodgers-CAL 17 67 3.94
5. Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 82 3.90
6. Katie MacCallum-ALBANY 19 69 3.63
7. HUK, Torrie-UML 20 66 3.30
8. Ghislaine Beerkens-ALBANY 19 62 3.26
9. Landon Warren-VERMONT 17 54 3.18
10. Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 49 2.72
11. Brianna Ricker-MAINE 18 44 2.44
12. LALANDE, Anouk-UML 20 48 2.40
13. Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 46 2.30
14. Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 45 2.14
15. Lauren Tucker-VERMONT 17 35 2.06
16. Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 39 2.05
17. Jackie Gillen-VERMONT 17 34 2.00
18. Frederike Helmke-ALBANY 19 36 1.89
19. Katrina Carter-CAL 14 26 1.86
20. Ashley Mendonca-UNH 20 37 1.85
 
POINTS GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 19 7 45 2.37
2. Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 15 10 40 1.90
3. Megan Rodgers-CAL 17 17 3 37 2.18
Savannah Burns-PACIFIC 19 14 9 37 1.95
5. LALANDE, Anouk-UML 20 14 3 31 1.55
6. Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 12 6 30 1.43
7. Katie MacCallum-ALBANY 19 12 5 29 1.53
8. Landon Warren-VERMONT 17 14 0 28 1.65
Libby Riedl-MAINE 18 9 10 28 1.56
Cicione, Marissa-STANFORD 21 11 6 28 1.33
11. Ghislaine Beerkens-ALBANY 19 12 1 25 1.32
12. Brianna Ricker-MAINE 18 10 4 24 1.33
Katie Audino-UNH 20 10 4 24 1.20
14. Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 8 7 23 1.28
Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 8 7 23 1.21
16. Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 6 8 20 1.00
17. Johnson, Sarah-STANFORD 21 4 10 18 0.86
18. Melina Moore-CAL 17 8 1 17 1.00
Kelsey Bridell-ALBANY 19 5 7 17 0.89
20. Ash Rutherford-PACIFIC 19 3 10 16 0.84
Emma Leach-PACIFIC 19 3 10 16 0.84
HUK, Torrie-UML 20 8 0 16 0.80
GEHRELS, Sophie-UML 20 7 2 16 0.80
 
POINTS PER GAME GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 19 7 45 2.37
2. Megan Rodgers-CAL 17 17 3 37 2.18
3. Savannah Burns-PACIFIC 19 14 9 37 1.95
4. Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 15 10 40 1.90
5. Landon Warren-VERMONT 17 14 0 28 1.65
6. Libby Riedl-MAINE 18 9 10 28 1.56
7. LALANDE, Anouk-UML 20 14 3 31 1.55
8. Katie MacCallum-ALBANY 19 12 5 29 1.53
9. Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 12 6 30 1.43
10. Cicione, Marissa-STANFORD 21 11 6 28 1.33
Brianna Ricker-MAINE 18 10 4 24 1.33
12. Ghislaine Beerkens-ALBANY 19 12 1 25 1.32
13. Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 8 7 23 1.28
14. Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 8 7 23 1.21
15. Katie Audino-UNH 20 10 4 24 1.20
16. Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 6 8 20 1.00
Melina Moore-CAL 17 8 1 17 1.00
18. Kelsey Bridell-ALBANY 19 5 7 17 0.89
19. Johnson, Sarah-STANFORD 21 4 10 18 0.86
Katrina Carter-CAL 14 4 4 12 0.86
 
GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 19 1.00
2. Megan Rodgers-CAL 17 17 1.00
3. Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 15 0.71
4. Landon Warren-VERMONT 17 14 0.82
Savannah Burns-PACIFIC 19 14 0.74
LALANDE, Anouk-UML 20 14 0.70
7. Katie MacCallum-ALBANY 19 12 0.63
Ghislaine Beerkens-ALBANY 19 12 0.63
Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 12 0.57
10. Cicione, Marissa-STANFORD 21 11 0.52
11. Brianna Ricker-MAINE 18 10 0.56
Katie Audino-UNH 20 10 0.50
13. Libby Riedl-MAINE 18 9 0.50
14. Melina Moore-CAL 17 8 0.47
Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 8 0.44
Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 8 0.42
HUK, Torrie-UML 20 8 0.40
18. Madison Cummings-MAINE 18 7 0.39
GEHRELS, Sophie-UML 20 7 0.35
20. Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 6 0.30
 
GOALS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 19 1.00
Megan Rodgers-CAL 17 17 1.00
3. Landon Warren-VERMONT 17 14 0.82
4. Savannah Burns-PACIFIC 19 14 0.74
5. Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 15 0.71
6. LALANDE, Anouk-UML 20 14 0.70
7. Katie MacCallum-ALBANY 19 12 0.63
Ghislaine Beerkens-ALBANY 19 12 0.63
9. Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 12 0.57
10. Brianna Ricker-MAINE 18 10 0.56
11. Cicione, Marissa-STANFORD 21 11 0.52
12. Katie Audino-UNH 20 10 0.50
Libby Riedl-MAINE 18 9 0.50
14. Melina Moore-CAL 17 8 0.47
15. Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 8 0.44
16. Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 8 0.42
17. HUK, Torrie-UML 20 8 0.40
18. Madison Cummings-MAINE 18 7 0.39
19. GEHRELS, Sophie-UML 20 7 0.35
20. Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 6 0.30
 
ASSISTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Libby Riedl-MAINE 18 10 0.56
Ash Rutherford-PACIFIC 19 10 0.53
Emma Leach-PACIFIC 19 10 0.53
Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 10 0.48
Johnson, Sarah-STANFORD 21 10 0.48
6. Femke Delissen-CAL 17 9 0.53
Savannah Burns-PACIFIC 19 9 0.47
8. DEFOURT, Clara-UML 20 8 0.40
Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 8 0.40
10. Casey Crowley-MAINE 18 7 0.39
Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 7 0.39
Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 7 0.37
Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 7 0.37
Kelsey Bridell-ALBANY 19 7 0.37
DOIRON, Christa-UML 20 7 0.35
Keyser, Katie-STANFORD 21 7 0.33
17. Lindsay Mathison-CAL 14 6 0.43
Emily Hindle-MAINE 18 6 0.33
Ashley Mendonca-UNH 20 6 0.30
Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 6 0.29
Cicione, Marissa-STANFORD 21 6 0.29
 
ASSISTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Libby Riedl-MAINE 18 10 0.56
2. Femke Delissen-CAL 17 9 0.53
3. Emma Leach-PACIFIC 19 10 0.53
Ash Rutherford-PACIFIC 19 10 0.53
5. Johnson, Sarah-STANFORD 21 10 0.48
Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 10 0.48
7. Savannah Burns-PACIFIC 19 9 0.47
8. Lindsay Mathison-CAL 14 6 0.43
9. DEFOURT, Clara-UML 20 8 0.40
Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 8 0.40
11. Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 7 0.39
Casey Crowley-MAINE 18 7 0.39
13. Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 7 0.37
Kelsey Bridell-ALBANY 19 7 0.37
Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 7 0.37
16. DOIRON, Christa-UML 20 7 0.35
17. Keyser, Katie-STANFORD 21 7 0.33
Emily Hindle-MAINE 18 6 0.33
19. Ashley Mendonca-UNH 20 6 0.30
20. Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 6 0.29
Cicione, Marissa-STANFORD 21 6 0.29
Katrina Carter-CAL 14 4 0.29
 
GAME-WINNING GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. Ghislaine Beerkens-ALBANY 19 5 0.26
2. Megan Rodgers-CAL 17 4 0.24
Kriekie van Wyk-PACIFIC 19 4 0.21
Cicione, Marissa-STANFORD 21 4 0.19
Zanolli, Corinne-STANFORD 21 4 0.19
6. Landon Warren-VERMONT 17 3 0.18
Kelsey Bridell-ALBANY 19 3 0.16
Bloem van den Brekel-UNH 20 3 0.15
HUK, Torrie-UML 20 3 0.15
GEHRELS, Sophie-UML 20 3 0.15
Gianna Bensaia-UNH 20 3 0.15
Bassi, Kristina-STANFORD 21 3 0.14
 
DEFENSIVE SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. Pleun Haantjes-VERMONT 17 6 0.35
2. MANKOWICH, Kelly-UML 20 4 0.20
3. Ashley Mendonca-UNH 20 3 0.15
Randolph, Nina-STANFORD 21 3 0.14
5. Borsack, Summer-UCD 16 2 0.12
Kate Young-UCD 17 2 0.12
Kelley Kramer-UCD 17 2 0.12
Samantha Wagg-MAINE 18 2 0.11
9. Madison Cohen-UCD 15 1 0.07
Gabi Jimenez-CAL 16 1 0.06
Farah Farjood-UCD 17 1 0.06
Maddie Ashbrook-CAL 17 1 0.06
Femke Delissen-CAL 17 1 0.06
Emma Leach-PACIFIC 19 1 0.05
Karlijn Roijakkers-PACIFIC 19 1 0.05
Carli Pelletier-ALBANY 19 1 0.05
Dana Bozek-ALBANY 19 1 0.05
Justine van Lathem-PACIFIC 19 1 0.05
Rachel Schannauer-ALBANY 19 1 0.05
Barry, Jordan-STANFORD 20 1 0.05
LYNES,Katie-UML 20 1 0.05
Stefanowicz, Millie-STANFORD 21 1 0.05
 
SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. Chelsea Bigelow-UCD 18 148 8.22
2. BERKHOUT, Eva-UML 19 143 7.53
3. Bing, Kelsey-STANFORD 20 112 5.60
4. Marlise van Tonder-PACIFIC 19 108 5.68
5. Lena Benwood-VERMONT 17 99 5.82
6. Kelsey Rudert-UNH 19 98 5.16
7. Melissa Nealon-ALBANY 19 88 4.63
8. Danielle Mentink-CAL 17 83 4.88
9. Emma Cochran-MAINE 18 59 3.28
10. Madelyn McAteer-UNH 4 15 3.75
 
SAVES PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Chelsea Bigelow-UCD 18 148 8.22
2. BERKHOUT, Eva-UML 19 143 7.53
3. Lena Benwood-VERMONT 17 99 5.82
4. Marlise van Tonder-PACIFIC 19 108 5.68
5. Bing, Kelsey-STANFORD 20 112 5.60
6. Kelsey Rudert-UNH 19 98 5.16
7. Danielle Mentink-CAL 17 83 4.88
8. Melissa Nealon-ALBANY 19 88 4.63
9. Emma Cochran-MAINE 18 59 3.28
 
SHUTOUTS GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. Melissa Nealon-ALBANY 19 4 0.21
2. Lena Benwood-VERMONT 17 3 0.18
Emma Cochran-MAINE 18 3 0.17
4. Marlise van Tonder-PACIFIC 19 2 0.11
5. Bing, Kelsey-STANFORD 20 1 0.05
Danielle Mentink-CAL 17 1 0.06
Kelsey Federico-UML 5 1 0.20
 
SHUTOUTS PER GAME GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. Melissa Nealon-ALBANY 19 4 0.21
2. Lena Benwood-VERMONT 17 3 0.18
3. Emma Cochran-MAINE 18 3 0.17
4. Marlise van Tonder-PACIFIC 19 2 0.11
5. Danielle Mentink-CAL 17 1 0.06
6. Bing, Kelsey-STANFORD 20 1 0.05
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG GP GA Minutes GA Avg
1. Melissa Nealon-ALBANY 19 28 1393:37 1.41
2. Bing, Kelsey-STANFORD 20 29 1365:29 1.49
3. Emma Cochran-MAINE 18 27 1219:57 1.55
4. Danielle Mentink-CAL 17 31 1139:09 1.90
5. Lena Benwood-VERMONT 17 39 1205:49 2.26
6. BERKHOUT, Eva-UML 19 46 1299:47 2.48
7. Marlise van Tonder-PACIFIC 19 50 1357:07 2.58
8. Kelsey Rudert-UNH 19 49 1289:55 2.66
9. Chelsea Bigelow-UCD 18 70 1277:55 3.83
 
SAVE PERCENTAGE GP Saves GA Save Pct.
1. Bing, Kelsey-STANFORD 20 112 29 .794
2. Melissa Nealon-ALBANY 19 88 28 .759
3. BERKHOUT, Eva-UML 19 143 46 .757
4. Danielle Mentink-CAL 17 83 31 .728
5. Lena Benwood-VERMONT 17 99 39 .717
6. Emma Cochran-MAINE 18 59 27 .686
7. Marlise van Tonder-PACIFIC 19 108 50 .684
8. Chelsea Bigelow-UCD 18 148 70 .679
9. Kelsey Rudert-UNH 19 98 49 .667
 
Team Identification Team ID
Albany ALBANY
California CAL
Maine MAINE
New Hampshire UNH
Pacific PACIFIC
Stanford STANFORD
UC Davis UCD
UMass Lowell UML
Vermont VERMONT